Fasstblog

I found this on another’s blog:

Only managed to find again this in Google’s cache.

John Grinder on a distinction that I find hugely important. So much in so few rows. Enjoy re-reading through (re)understanding

You mentioned “…comments of some NLP trainers who say/claim that one’s unconscious knows everything. While not directly relevant to your comment, if I really were omniscient, then why would I need their training in the first place?”

Such trainers have little apparent working knowledge of the differences between conscious and unconscious processes: as mentioned several times previously: we live with an enormous paradox: the conscious mind is superb at categorizing, classifying, making computations defined over FA but has almost zero ability to actually change anything. The unconscious processes are capable of miraculous work but haven’t got a clue about how to escape the fundamental associations formed by their inductive logic through organization. Thus, our effectiveness in large part is determined by how well we coordinate these two great entities within us as a team.

Comments by so-called trainers of this nature reveal their ignorance.

So what is the principle of balance based upon? Or Equity or Justice or respect or relativity? or strategy of? Why in other words but not just that the mechanical effects which we decide upon? Epistemology.

Yeah I like this song much. I uploaded it to Sendspace.com. I wonder how long it will be up there. Anyway here is the link:

Oceanlab - Clear Blue Water (Ferry Corsten Remix).mp3

“Before Enlightenment chop wood carry water, after Enlightenment, chop wood carry water.”

My speciality, passion, skill, talent and interest is linguistics, specifically non-verbal grammar, non-verbal behavior, grammar of the non-verbal. Of the talents that can be used by the communical skill set, I perform explicitly well in the non-verbal linguistics field. To use me as anything less is profane and perverse and denies rationality and turns toward twisted filthiness.

What is more important than performance? Direct performance, achievement forms?

Negative of the 1919 solar eclipse taken from the report of Sir Arthur Eddington on the expedition to verify Einstein’s prediction of the bending of light around the sun. For positive version, see Image.

Like my art drawing. Unconscious. Like a song. Unconscious. Forgetting myself effectively. Go unconscious. At the level of the unconscious it is purely and act of art not effectively not performance so much. An act without. A free act. And forgetting myself. We need to go back to the unconscious state, unfilled without expectations, only for love. love. The unconscious love act. Conscious unconscious act. For love only. For love. Just for the state. Release! Release!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No Consciousness. None. None. An unconscious act. Going unconscious.

Not just unconscious, but free act. Free of want and recompense. Like the Darwin and his beetles. The grubbing of monies away. I really like the language called non-verbal. To make a model of that would be semi fun. It is as though what I need to do since I have associated myself, asking myself the question, and now I receive the answer. A purely unselfish act. Selfish at its core, however that state of want described by the hungry man excluded. And I must go into the nagual and forget myself. Now that I have asked my question it is requisite that I do this. To ask and not perform is fruitless. To perform is like the dreamer, ignorant, or a possible fool. So I ask the question and the teacher gives me the still small instruction. And I must possibly forget myself in some act described by the formless itself. Maybe this model I like. And give myself up to it. Amen.

We have fractured our entity to produce maximum efficiency.